View Single Post
Old Aug 7th, 2004, 01:16 AM   #5
rhogg
MINI2 Newbie
 
Join Date: May 2004
Local Time: 11:01 PM
Posts: 29
Offline
Indeed I was snide, and perhaps without justification.

If it is a true closed end lease and there is no residual / market value risk the drop in residual basically is transfer of risk, although the prices are virtually unchanged.

I checked the Mini.ca websight but they don't have their lease contract on it. I would call Mini Financial and ask what the difference if any there is in the conrtracts and end of lease risk. ( There were closed when I checked this.) If the 2004 and 2005 contracts are the same, it is a transfer of risk that has taken place rather than a price change. On the 2004 contract MINI is carrying more risk if you can truly walk away with a market value below the residual. But be warned lots af closed end leases are anything but. Without seeing the Minin contract I can't comment on theirs.
Canada   Reply With Quote