![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread |
| | #1 |
| Kernow Mini Man | R56 Potential Performance Hi people, has anyone got an idea what the fastest upgrade will be for the new R56. I'd like it to be something to be like 0-60mph in 4-5 secs but just wondered if any of you had any info on the turbos that are due to be released. Would be nice if someone could bring out a turbo that would make the mini capable of doing that Please reply if you have any rumours or info about future turbo's Cheers ![]() |
| |
| | |
| Sponsored Links Registered members do not see Google Ads posts, they can also post messages, pictures, and classified adverts. Register your free account today and become a member of MINI2 - MINI Forum | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Overboosting..... Join Date: Sep 2003 Local Time: 11:27 AM
Posts: 3,492
Offline | Someone may well bring out a turbo big enough to achieve the sort of stats your after but the engine and gearbox would more likely give up way before it gets close to that sort of power. Your buying the wrong car if you want that sort of performance IMO. |
| |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| MINI2 Regular Join Date: Oct 2006 Local Time: 01:27 PM
Posts: 69
Offline | Lets go for a different approach, I wonder how much power can be taken from Cooper sans the turbo. Ive read 140 has been achieved quite easyly from old one, more from this new more sophisticated one? |
| |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| THE STICK Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Worcestershire WR15 Local Time: 11:27 AM
Posts: 2,988
Offline | I would think that reliably that you will still be looking at 140 ish maybe straying to 150. Its all about what stuff is on the engine and not how sophisticated it is. I think the internals will be stronger but the need for reliability will still keep the overall power recomended to around the 140-150 mark. |
| |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| Wants an Audi | 175 BHP Sounds Good To Me I had a fiat coupe turbo that was front wheel drive. It was 220 BHP standard but with a lot of cash and new everything it was up to 300 BHP. But that was a 2.0 20V Turbo. However my point is that even a heaver car like the fiat coupe couldn’t get the power down to take full advantage. My new MCS is on order and think I will limit my self to a ECU remap. 175 BHP is very good as standard… I cant wait My new MCS Spec Laser Blue Lea Punch Carbon Black Full Leather Chili Pack 3 Spoke Sport st wheel 17” Crown spoke alloys comfort access floor mats pass seat height adjust Front fog lights Bi-Xenon Headlights Auto Air Con Computer Interior light pack Sat Nav Sports suspension Multifunction st wheel Chrome line interior Visibility Pack Roof in body colour Darkened rear glass Auto dim interior mirror Colour line grey Anthracite roof lining Interior trim piano black Rain sensors and lights on TV Function ---- External chrome line (just added not included in price below) TLC Full colour coding around lower bumpers (Dealer Fit) TOTAL £22,295 |
| |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| Stealth Cooper Join Date: May 2006 Location: Lancashire Local Time: 11:27 AM
Posts: 1,195
Offline | my dads got an original quattro turbo like the rally ones its got 250bhp but to get that its got a big ass turbo which if comes off boost will give an enormous amount of lag which is why the modern audis use bi turbo a small turbo coupled with a big turbo to solve this problem which is what you'll get trying to get that sort of power out of a mini with a single turbo. ![]() |
| |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| MINI2 Newbie Join Date: Oct 2006 Local Time: 10:27 AM
Posts: 25
Offline | There seems to be many misunderstandings on this forum about turbos. Lag isnt at what point the turbo kicks in, this is called boost threshhold. Lag is the time it takes for the intake pipes to be filled up with air from when the throttle is press and the turbo is in range for boost. Many bigger turbos are capable of very little lag. I have also read alot of times on here about people wanting to use the scoop to cool the turbo... A turbo shouldnt be cooled because this will actually increase lag and boost threshhold. this is becuase the hotter the turbo the faster the exhaust gasses run, therefore quicker the spool up, you can buy kits to actually keep the heat in the turbo. You only want to cool the air coming out of the turbo, hence use of intercoolers. Also there are many other turbos that use the twin scroll technology, Evos use the same technology. You are not going to loose driveablity unless you get a turbo too big for the engine, for example a T4 size turbo is very likely to be way to big, there are many turbos that are larger and will give good driveability and performance, a GT28R is will probably hit full boost between 2-3000rpm and give little lag, due to a roller bearing set up, but as said before a custom manifold and downpipe will be needed. Also just because its FWD and will have alot of power doesnt mean it will be hard to drive. there are many things that affect that, diff, tyres, suspension set up. I have a rover coupe turbo with 248bhp (dyno proven) and that put the power down fantastically with barly any wheel spin (uses a torsen diff) and i know of people running more and there still perfectly drivable. If you have a bigger turbo as long as you actually drive the car properly there will be no loss in drivability, just make sure the turbos in range. |
| |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| MINI2 Master Join Date: Oct 2006 Local Time: 11:27 AM
Posts: 1,838
Offline | Sorry to break it to you guys but the new Mini 1.6 T is actually very very hard to get power gains out of. There was an artical in autoexpress about this very subject and BMW admit that they actively encouraged modding on the originla BMW MCS, and that that engine could take tuning very easily. However they say that the new efficiaent engine is already pushed very close to its limits at 170bhp, they admit it is quite a challenge for them to get up to the required 200-210 for the new works model. It seems that the engine is just a little too "efficient". The other thing is, with the Turbo in a Mini shell you will see other downsides, Heat will be one and dissipation of that heat. I am not sure where the intercoolers are on the new mini, i would assume its some sort of side mount in the wheel arch like most of the VAGS. Also what type of Turbo is it and again am i right in assuming the turbo is between the bulk head. But all must remember when an engine is released very well tuned, it is har to get much more out of it on the cheap. I doubt you will see as many cheap mods as you did on the old supercharged unit. |
| |
| | #14 (permalink) |
| Deals Gap Junkie | I have a question I haven't seen yet. Current new R56 MCS owners can help! What is the fuel cut [redline] of the new turbo engine? I see the red segments on the tachometer start at 6,500RPM, but want to find out at what RPM the fuel cut occurs. Thanks! Ryan ![]() |
| |
| | #15 (permalink) |
| MINI2 Newbie Join Date: Jan 2007 Local Time: 05:27 AM
Posts: 32
Offline | I severely doubt we are at the full potential of this engine. I have already read a few times that the block is already sleeved, so that opens up some potential. Only time will tell what this engine is capable of. |
| |
| | #16 (permalink) |
| MINI2 Regular Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Essex Local Time: 11:27 AM
Posts: 274
Offline | Does that price include all the on the road charges like Delivery, fuel, tax etc because at 1st glance that seems a really gd price considering you've got every piece of kit bar bluetooth and hifi???? |
| |
| | #19 (permalink) |
| Deals Gap Junkie | Sorry, didn't mean to snip at you, I think we're in total agreement that the Prince engine will have good potential. If I had just one wish with this engine, it would be lower compression pistons. That's going to hurt when I get the itch for power and I can't turn up the boost very much. The DI only quenches knock so much! To Ant FR---> the intercooler will most likely not be the first area in need of upgrading...nor the 2nd, 3rd, or 4th. The turbo, ECU, pistons, head gasket, exhaust, and intake will all need changing most likely before the intercooler is a marked restriction. That's just an initial guess however, until the tuners in the 'states get a hold of the car and find out for sure. ![]() |
| |
| | #20 (permalink) |
| MINI2 Newbie Join Date: Jan 2007 Local Time: 05:27 AM
Posts: 32
Offline | I completely agree with you man. The thing that really has me fiending for more power out of this engine is that my 1.6 liter 16 valve mr2 with a supercharger on it pushing maybe just maybe 10psi is about 150hp, you cant even begin to tell me with 18 years of technological advancements in engines that we are only squeaking out 25 extra horses... ![]() |
| |
| | |
| Sponsored Links Registered members do not see Ads posts, they can also post messages, pictures, and classified adverts. Register your free account today and become a member of MINI2 - MINI Forum | |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Rate This Thread | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| r56 s and old works s performance comparisons. | grantw | 2nd Gen MINI Cooper S | 23 | Jan 19th, 2007 12:18 PM |
| R56 Auto performance figures.... | Dazmac13 | 2nd Gen Automatic | 4 | Jan 11th, 2007 10:35 PM |
| R56 Cooper S performance figures | RonBurgundy | 2nd Gen MINI Cooper S | 8 | Nov 20th, 2006 03:59 PM |
| Is this a potential problem? | pob | Faults & Fixes | 13 | Nov 24th, 2004 08:36 PM |
| Potential Freakout | sjjn | MINI Cooper S | 1 | Jul 12th, 2002 12:31 PM |