![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread |
| | #1 |
| MINI2 Newbie Join Date: May 2007 Location: Arizona Local Time: 10:18 PM
Posts: 38
Offline | R56 suspension travel. Less than R53? I'm quoting a post by Ryephile here. He measured his suspension travel when he did a spring change and was unpleasantly surprised at the results. I don't think he'd mind using his measurements/comments here: While I was installing my H&R springs this weekend I took some suspension travel measurements. The results are shocking, and totally contradict the MINI-corporate rumor of the R56 having more suspension travel versus the R53. As an inital note, the front struts and rear shocks of the R56 look, install, and feel all but idential to the R53's shocks. There are just some very minor mounting point tweaks [front strut mounts, front springs a smaller diameter, rear shock mounting point is like the GP]. I measured from the axle of both ends of the car to the bottom of the wheel arch apex. This suspension-to-body reference allows me to easily see shock position during ride height, full droop, free compression travel [until touching the bumpstop], and full compression with bumpstop fully compressed. Front Axle to arch apex: Droop: 17.4" Stock ride height: 14.3" To bumpstop contact: 14.1" Full Compression: 12.4" Total front travel: 5.0" Free uptravel: 0.2" Total uptravel: 1.9" Downtravel: 3.1" Rear Axle to arch apex: Droop: 17.0" Stock ride height: 14.4" To bumpstop contact: 13.4" Full Compression: 12.4" Total rear travel: 4.6" Free uptravel: 1.0" Total uptravel: 2.0" Downtravel: 2.6" These results are SCARY! This means that lowering the R56 AT ALL will mean no free uptravel, riding on bumpstops "Miata-style". For me, this means that the R56 has not a smidge more travel than the R53, and I'll be lobbying for proper short-body coilovers to become available on the market ASAP. The suspension links will probably handle more travel, but right now the shocks are too long for a lowered MINI.Cheers, Ryan |
| |
| | |
| Sponsored Links Registered members do not see Google Ads posts, they can also post messages, pictures, and classified adverts. Register your free account today and become a member of MINI2 - MINI Forum | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| MINI2 Newbie Join Date: Apr 2007 Local Time: 01:18 AM
Posts: 37
Offline | This is a concern for me as I want to lower (have to, really) but wanted to do it via springs as it's the most inexpensive way to do it. If I was guaranteed that all suspension components were fine 5 years from now I'd go ahead and do it but reading that analysis scares me. |
| |
| | |
| Sponsored Links Registered members do not see Ads posts, they can also post messages, pictures, and classified adverts. Register your free account today and become a member of MINI2 - MINI Forum | |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Rate This Thread | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| JCW suspension on R53 Cooper | mico | Suspension | 0 | Mar 8th, 2007 02:43 PM |
| R53 MCS SS+ compared to R56 MCS standard suspension & the sports suuspension | JohnWB | 2nd Gen Suspension | 8 | Feb 26th, 2007 03:12 PM |
| R56 Suspension on an R53 | Mike Edwards | Suspension | 3 | Dec 10th, 2006 09:17 PM |
| Suspension Travel/Damping | Ezzer | Faults & Fixes | 2 | Mar 22nd, 2003 09:45 AM |
| Suspension travel/damping | Ezzer | MINI Cooper | 1 | Feb 28th, 2003 09:15 PM |