[Loui]

Quote: Originally Posted by 1320autos (original)

I hope that means that you now believe us when we say we only report what the dyno tell us good or bad Roland.

I must admit the intercooled 17% cars we've had in before really bowled us a swerve ball by not performing, CooperSlad was one, we eventually solved that mystery through someone elses purchasing parts of his car so we found out what that problem was and the other one which made very low numbers believed he had 230 anyway when the dyno said he didn't for whatever reason, unfotunatley you cant help everyone.

I was impressed with the difference the 17% made in the 30-70 test however I'm not quite happy with it at the autodrome.

We're very lucky at the moment to have customer like Ben who are competitive and want to see what difference each component makes.

I think March may be the month when we all go "how much torque / horsepower":

Can only think mine made more HP when we went back to 15% due to the crank pulley?

BTW std map back in mine an its as different again