Content Wrapper

[ItsNumptyBoy]

Quote: Originally Posted by Tonyrec (original)

Dont know how to reply to this post as its full of opinion and facts that arent strictly correct.
All that i will say is that theres always two sides to every story...........both of which will never appear on the same post on an internet site.

Very True.

Quote: Originally Posted by Tonyrec (original)

If the information in this post is both correct and factually accurate, iam surprised that a Section 59 order was given in these circumstances. There are other more appropriate ways to deal with this.
Is this the first time that you have been stopped - is there any history here that would 'force' the officer to deal with this this way?

Valid opinion and question also.

Quote: Originally Posted by as400

How petty, and in the mean time the stabbings continue...

Are you seriously suggesting that this PC ignored an on going assault/stabbing/serious crime in order to deal with something less important directly in front of him?? There is great kudos in making arrests of quality villains, especially in relation to current political "hot potatoes"....so I think that suggestion is, ummm, stoooopid

Quote: Originally Posted by as400

Personally I never have my car registered at my home address and always give false details.

Quality advice!! Compound any routine check, or even minor warning situation, with a genuine false details statutory offence. Hardly Michael Mansfield QC are we??