![]() | ![]() |
| |
| |||||||
| First Generation MINI Tuning Tuning the first generation MINI 2001 - 2006 |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
| |||
| Which intercooler? I have a 2006 mcs with a 15% reduced pulley, milltek exhaust, bluefin custom remap, k&n typhoon induction kit. I think th next logical step is a larger intercooler. Just wondering which is best? Last edited by lucachiarelli; Aug 7th, 2007 at 03:46 PM. Reason: wrong title |
| Sponsored Links | ||
Advertisement | ||
| ||||
| We have seen very good results on the dyno with the GRS on and also on the dragstrip which is a real world dyno on our car and even a customers car. We have a stock map in our car and have see 250bhp and 219.9whp First M45 Cooper S to run a 12 (12.96@105) On Nitrous 11.16@123 0-100 7.1991 ![]() http://www.1320MINI.co.uk |
| |||
| did'nt think the I/c was there purely for performance. The big thing is trying to lower those bloody intake temps to try to lower the temp the car runs at. Performance is always a buy prouduct along with the better and more sustained performance levels in hot conditions. |
| ||||
| The Janspeed manifold and GRS IC would be a nice combo of parts added to your present combination. First M45 Cooper S to run a 12 (12.96@105) On Nitrous 11.16@123 0-100 7.1991 ![]() http://www.1320MINI.co.uk |
| ||||
| I know that you guys mean well, but it would be best to find out what this guy wants to do first. I mean, when you tell folks that you don't change the ECU and run this stuff on the drag strip and track most people will never do this and following that advice could quickly shorten the life of their engine. I would say that 95% of the people on the forums just want to increase HP and driveability not prep for the Indy 500. So advice should be given around that level. The Fireball Tim's or the group are the extreme and hopefully have the funds to replace what they destroy. Most of the MINI's that I have seen are running rich when the stock map is used over a proper tuning with just a 15% pulley. That being said, there are one or two that I know that don't have this problem which shows that every engine is different and needs to be handled differently. So my question to the original poster is... What are you trying to achieve? Don't just strap on parts for the sake of strapping on parts. |
| ||||
| I believe Longboard on NAM was running a stock map with the famed Jesus head making 231.9whp. I believe the stock ecu is very clever and its really hard to find extra hp/trq unless your name begins with J I know where you're coming from Da Flake and we should also advise people to do a health check (compression and leakdown) first before any mods are made. First M45 Cooper S to run a 12 (12.96@105) On Nitrous 11.16@123 0-100 7.1991 ![]() http://www.1320MINI.co.uk |
| |||
| The car will never go on a drag strip or a track day. My car is for fast road use only. I just want a faster cooper s, i have some money to spend on the car. Just wanted some advie on what the next stages in performance are and if they will be reliable. |
| ||||
| It is very clever to be sure. One of the things that I tell people about a remap is that is NOT for HP but rather to simply let the car know what you have done to it. Nothing more. If a side affect of tuning is that you get a few more ponies, then so be it but that should not be the end state. What the end state should be is a car that runs smooth with good response when the driver needs it. I have seen and read the mixed reviews with tunings and all I can say is that most of the bad stuff comes from the fact that they don't get what they expect because they don't understand it or buy the HP hype. IMHO, you should be doing both evenly to get the best "street" performance which will provide good power without sacrificing engine life. What I don't want to see are people that are strapping on parts just to get the immediate boost in power only to find that 500 miles later they need a new head because they cracked it or warped it. You suggestion of a health check is dead on.... NAM is solid proof of the utter confusion that is going on and also proof that more is not always better. Last edited by DaFlake; Aug 8th, 2007 at 02:26 PM. Reason: Spelling |
| Thanks for this post from: | ||
| ||||
| Regardless, what I said is still valid. I have one of the first GRS units built. Graham is a great guy. IF you feel you have to get an IC his is my pick of the litter. It is also true that everything I noted will make a greater performance impact than the IC especially on a mildly modded car like the original posters. So bragging about your fast car doesn't really help the poster at all. And lose the stock map and get a good tune and I'm quite sure that 250HP will look a bit weak. |
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Which intercooler do you have? | Damo | First Generation MINI Tuning | 12 | Aug 17th, 2007 10:16 AM |
| What intercooler do i go for | Ant FR | First Generation MINI Tuning | 4 | Jun 12th, 2007 10:58 AM |
| Intercooler | Ven0m | First Generation MINI Tuning | 9 | Oct 31st, 2006 11:01 AM |
| Large Intercooler / Closed Intercooler | GTT 280 | First Generation MINI Tuning | 7 | Aug 22nd, 2005 10:06 PM |
| My new intercooler!!! | MiniMan7 | First Generation MINI Exterior | 16 | May 28th, 2004 05:45 PM |
|