![]() | ![]() |
| |
| |||||||
| First Generation MINI Tuning Tuning the first generation MINI 2001 - 2006 |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
| |||
| Various combinations are now being tested,throttle size, (now 70mm ) pulley size ,(now smaller), various bypass valve arrangements, injector sizes. -each alteration gives important information on boost levels /temps ,throttle response,belt lengths,fuelling . Each pulley size alteration causes a change in boost pressure ,and until you run that size pulley the boost level is unknown , The pulley is bolt on so an easy job to replace,no puller is required ,it can be done with engine in its mounts ,not needing lifting,just 1 bolt and tighten to 30ftlb , and a new belt . Back on Dyno next week ,and see what the output is raised to . |
| Sponsored Links | ||
Advertisement | ||
| |||
| Hi Adam, did you ever try fitting the vacuum guage before the TB but after the filter ?( Clean side of the air filter) to see if the filter was restricting (stretching the air) rather than the TB. What size filter are you using? Hope you can make it on the track at the Castle Combe Mini action day on Sat 29th Sept. ![]() |
| ||||
| Looks like you've got to make more than 250whp at 7k Adam otherwise you wont here the last off it. First M45 Cooper S to run a 12 (12.96@105) On Nitrous 11.16@123 0-100 7.1991 ![]() http://www.1320MINI.co.uk |
| ||||
| will we ever see the opcon merge into the GTT kits? The GTT kit i already have fitted to my car is top grade workmanship. It more than meets my needs....... but woldn't it be nice to add just that little extra refinement?... )I'm sure i asked this before Roland, and i think we both agreed its more than just a bolt on activity. Cheers, K. ![]() Too many mods to list, PM me if the cat needs killing... |
| |||
| OPCON - Using Standard Head? Adam, is your conversion using the standard head? There seems to be a great deal of misinformation about the limitations of the standard head. Can your conversion deliver 260 - 275 bhp (flywheel) with the standard head? It is often said, correctly or incorrectly, that about 240 bhp is the limit with the standard head using the Eaton. Your more efficient charger may be producing lower intake temperatures & thereby delivering greater power with the standard head through greater intake density. My question is this: With a pullied Eaton blower (15%, 17% or 19%) which is the weaker link in generating more power - the charger's inability to deliver enough air or the head's ability to ingest & exhaust the mixture? I often felt that a pullied Eaton runs out of puff (& loses thermal efficiency) well before the standard head hits its limits? |
| |||
| the gains with the conversion are around 20+ by using less power to drive,and 20+ by having cooler more dense air at the same boost levels, these gains increase as the boost level is increased ,and charger rpm increased,. -so a 220 eaton conversion would see 260 with opcon at the same boost. if stock head limit is circa 240 then 280 would be the opcon equivalent. head and eaton charger work against each other ie the heads flow restriction ,causes the boost pressure to be higher and thus causing the eaton to enter a far less efficient area when pullied. The eaton does not like going much over 13 psi , it will do it ,but starts to lose efficiency,the stock head adds 2-3 psi by restriction,this varies through the rpm range ,at the lower rpms ,cam,valves, dictate the airflow,at the higher rpms the exhaust valves and manifold dictate the airflow. |
| Thanks for this post from: | ||
| |||
| UPDATE After many hours trying various combinations,I have now fitted a revised intake to the charger and a smaller pulley ,also removed the extra injectors and moved to 450cc to replace the stock ones. the intake size and length make a large change to the operation of the charger and move both boost output and rpm that the boost comes in at ,torque seems to have increased a lot and moved slightly higher up the rev range. Reliability has not been a problem the charger has worked faultlessly,so early in the new year its back to the dyno to get some more numbers. I feel the present set up is about right for a road use car ,plenty of power and nice and linear, Not having the extra injectors/control unit also will reduce costs Tried very large throttle -far too snappy and throws up too many EML issues (race use only -and would need a standalone ECU ) Could a smaller pulley be fitted? -yes but I feel the extra torque would be unnecessary its already at the traction limit and any more would become a handfull to drive and need a revised traction control system. I will try to get some in gear accelleration times as soon as the roads dry out -I cant get grip at the moment As the current superchargers clock up higher mileage and start to fail,this would be a reasonable alternative for an upgrade as a bolt on kit especially if I can reduce prices further still |
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Tags: supercharger |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Opcon Supercharger??? | Ant FR | First Generation MINI Tuning | 53 | Feb 9th, 2009 09:22 PM |
| KM to MPH conversion - HELP | vonny | MINI in Motorsport | 6 | Mar 29th, 2005 08:01 PM |
| Do it yourself or conversion??? | nealskilling | First Generation MINI Tuning | 1 | Jul 5th, 2004 11:10 AM |
| S conversion ?????????????????? | bigalloys | First Generation MINI Tuning | 6 | Jan 7th, 2004 10:06 AM |
| Conversion, or NOT! | Tone | First Generation MINI Tuning | 7 | Jan 22nd, 2003 01:07 PM |
|