Hi Guys, Ive already done the test (GRS v GTT) already on two different occasions. Once on a GTT220 (ish) spec car and once on my own. On average GTT is about 4 deg C cooler and achieves about 0.5-0.7 psi more boost. GTT is bigger (tube area around 15% more) that is the only reason why. We get extra size by providing a neat alloy plate that moves the coil back to give clearance where the HT leads are. Grahams is fine aswell ,its a bit cheaper as we're vat registered ,mind you outside the EU ours is just £399.
I hadnt intended putting this up ,but as someone mentioned it I've offered the results.
Oh we did some tests on a Forge one too.....you dont want to know how that faired (different car admittadly). We didnt compare to stock but tbf I think both GTT and GRS will outperform stock quite comfortably. I dont think RR's are going to be very reliable for testing ints tbh.
If the boost is up and charge temps are lower you can be almost guaranteed more power on the road. Its not rocket science or GTT badge that explain why it works better its effective area of the core. Both use quality core and both position well for the scoop. I use third gear with 4 or 5 WOT runs from about 3000rpm to 6800rpm watching the peak at end of each run, then taking average of the 5 runs. First run starts with charge air temp near as poss to ambient by driving off the throttle for a bit.
Best Regards Roland GTT