![]() | ![]() |
| |
| |||||||
| First Generation MINI Tuning Tuning the first generation MINI 2001 - 2006 |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
| Sponsored Links | ||
Advertisement | ||
| |||
| I got probs to understand ![]() So you mean, with a 15% pulley, it is already out of tolerances ? 'cause i doubt JCW will go out of tolerance, on the GP it is 14.xx pulley and 7250rpm ! If you can explain me please ![]() And all Cooper S Tech docs said 11,60PSI (0,8bar) with the orginal pulley ! |
| ||||
| Ok, the equation i used for the pressure from the supercharger is as follows: Pulley Stock S/C CC/rev 750 Engine CC 1600 Pulley Ratio 2.13 Atmospheric Pressure 14.7 Valve Overlap 4 (((750/(1600/2)*2.13*14.7)-14.7)-((4/10)*0.05) = 14.6340625 Boost 14.6340625 Do point out anything you think is amiss from it, i'm going to see if i can remember any other equations, and if i can find the info for the valve overlap on a standard cam (the 4 degrees is a shrick fast road cam) |
| ||||
| Maybe the equation doesnt count for inefficiencies. As the speed goes up the pressure doesnt go up the same amount ![]() 17% is 18psi max. |
| |||
| Silent1, I’ll add tolerance stacking and differences in volumetric efficiency as other variables. On my vehicle with head/valves & exhaust manifold improvements, the highest pressure documented was 17psi, on a 101 F day with a 19%. Stock head, cat back, and 15%, saw 16psi on a very hot day, both attained on a dyno. I know this is an exercise and thank you for the effort. tirlibibi, the JCW pulley is 58 mm OD. If you use the Eaton OD stock measurement it would be ~11.5% smaller. I’ve measured more than a few of both pulleys and have not seen anything smaller than ~10.9% reduction in comparison. |
| Thanks for this post from: | ||
| |||
| and dont forget the supercharger power comsumption from crank is non linear and rpm dependent.and the effect of turbulence within charger,and altered clearances between rotor/case, and altitude -give up yet |
| |||
| Here is something else to consider, boost is formed in the intake manifold, not the Roots SC. Eaton’s supercharger is not a compressor, it moves air into the IM faster than it can be consumed, and air stacks behind the intake valves creating pressure above atmospheric. This is the reason changes downstream of the supercharger (VE improvements, valve overlap/cam profile, etc.) can affect boost and why best case pressure calculations are not valid in all situations; although, good for SC rpm comparisons. |
| ||||
| You mean pressure build up anywhere after the SC outlet |
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Tags: crank, diameter, pulley, supercharger |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Supercharging a Cooper | craigoz | First Generation MINI Tuning | 5 | May 12th, 2006 04:52 AM |
| Turbocharging Vs Supercharging | Themikanic | First Generation MINI Cooper S | 16 | Jan 12th, 2005 03:47 AM |
| Supercharging a Mini One | Miniheffer | First Generation MINI Tuning | 2 | Aug 17th, 2004 09:37 PM |
| Supercharging standard cooper | Claire Elise | First Generation MINI Cooper | 15 | Nov 10th, 2003 12:57 AM |
| Negative Supercharging | GordonD | First Generation MINI Tuning | 6 | May 13th, 2003 12:06 AM |
|