![]() | ![]() |
| |
| |||||||
| First Generation MINI Tuning Tuning the first generation MINI 2001 - 2006 |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
| Sponsored Links | ||
Advertisement | ||
| ||||
| Ooops - you are right - I forgot those "small" bits Thanks for the correction - the cylinder head, coated-rotor SC, plugs and injectors no doubt make a substantial contribution to a Works car. That's why I figured mine will be a kind of the near-beer version to the real thing. Sorta like it, but not as good! 2005 MCSC |
| ||||
| According to Randy Webb, his pulley adds 16 HP (see his site, webbmotorsports.com ujnder the Alta pulley). The JCW airbox and exhaust together add about 8 - 10 (and some feel that's a conservative number). At the very least, 16 plus 8 is 24 - and added to 168 that's 192. (I have seen some claims that stock HP is in the 168-173 range). Of course, this is all theoretically speaking. But I can tell you there is indeed a bit more oomph than I had before, not shockingly so, but there. 2005 MCSC |
| ||||
| I got a PM asking me to compare my "05 JCW Jr." car to a full- on Works car. Here's how it shakes down, including a few new points I have learned since I started this thread: 1) Unused JCW intake purchased 2nd hand - cost $225, plus $225 for dealer install (playing it safe with the warranty issue). 2) Lightly used (about 400 miles) JCW catback exhaust - cost $500 plus $180 to have my Audi/BMW mechanic install it. Has a great sound and those bling exhaust tips. 3) Alta 15% pulley, part w/installation by Randy Webb - $400 and includes his own 24,000 mile warranty. 4) Total HP is now about 195, about the same as a 2004 JCW car. 5) Almost totally (with exception of the pulley) still JCW/OEM. So resale value retained and very likely increased. Total cost: $1530.00 Keeping in mind this: 1) The JCW supercharger is EXACTLY the same as the supercharger on the 2005 cars - nothing gained there. 2) The 15% Alta pulley is VERY close to the size of the JCW pulley, so much so that no ECU remapping is necessary. 3) The re-ported cylinder head offers no big HP gain and by some estimates, is not even as good as the stock one. Why have it? Well, it is the single most time-comsuming aspect of the JCW package, so the dealer can now charge an arm AND a leg for the total installation. 4) Colder plugs? OK, nice to have, but again - no big HP gain. 5) Increase of about 20 HP versus the scenario above. 6) JCW badges. Admittedly, these look very cool. I'd want them if I didn't have to buy the package to get them. Total cost: $6000.00 and up So what we have, essentially, is $1530 vs. $6000+ (for parts and installation). Are the JCW cylinder head, colder plugs and gain of 20 HP worth the extra $4500? I think not. With the "extra" $4500, I bought a set of JCW 18 inch wheels (lightly used) for $1000 (which will go on when my RFs wear out), a JCW strut brace (from Canada) for $325 (I'll install it myself), a chromed intercooler cover with the red "S" for $100 (OK, no "Works" badge, I'll live without it... installed by myself), and may yet buy the JCW suspension and still have change! 2005 MCSC |
| |||
| "1) The JCW supercharger is EXACTLY the same as the supercharger on the 2005 cars - nothing gained there" This isn't actually true the supercharger on all MCS's is same for all models. There isn't any difference between 2003 and 2005. |
| ||||
|
Actually it is true ... Prior to July 2004 builds there was a difference in the coating used on the vanes of the stock and JCW superchargers. Now there is not ... a 5th generation Eaton supercharger is used for both stock and JCW. Exactly. 2005 MCSC |
| |||
| I stand corrected. John Cooper Garages still advertise on their website that they either alter or replace the supercharger in someway, I suppose thay can get away with due to the fact that they replace the pulley. Shows what a rip off the whole thing is that neither BMW or JCG were willing to pass the saving of not having to replace the supercharger back to the customer, which I guess is why they are happy to throw in the brakes now with the factory fit option. |
| ||||
|
So resale value retained and very likely increased. Sorry but I have to disagree with this statement. Unless you have an official John Cooper Works kit on your car you will not increase your resale value by bolting on a few official and unofficial parts. In fact, because of your modifications you have effected the resale of your car, both price and desirability, in a negative way. Modifying cars can give a very satisfying and rewarding result but anybody who does this has to be prepared to lose money on their cars value. I don't mean to sound harsh but you have to be realistic. You cannot brand your car a "JCW Jr" and expect that to have any credibility when you sell. |
| ||||
| Well, obviously I disagree. First of all, I'm not "branding" my car as anything, it was meant as a "quotes" in a thread title. I would never sell my car as a Works car, I would sell it as a car with many Works modifications added to it! I do wonder, though - how is my car is so vastly different from a Works car, when I have the exact same air intake, supercharger, exhaust and same sized pulley? Yes, it is not a "true" Works car, I've never claimed that it is. But to suggest that OEM modifications has decreased the value of my car is ludicrous. The single non-OEM mod is the pulley. I can see your argument if the car were loaded up with a half-dozen non-OEM parts. But these were designed for the Mini Cooper by JCW, as performance enhancements, so to suggest that adding them to the car diminishes it's value is nonsensical. 2005 MCSC |
| ||||
| As far as I can tell the only official products you have is the exhaust and air filter so it is indeed very different to a Works car. Seen as the majority of your increased power is coming from your aftermarket 15% pulley, which wasn't designed or fitting by JCW, I don't see how you seriously expect your cars value to have increased Your pulley will void your warentee and TLC with most dealers, therefore lowering its resale value. This is the harsh reality of modifying a car and its the reason the Works kit (1)Costs so much (2)Retains some of its value. |
| ||||
| By the time I'm done my car will have: JCW intake JCW exhaust JCW strut brace JCW suspension JCW wheels. JCW supercharger (well, it IS the same as the JCW in my 2005!) Hmmm....worth less after these mods? I don't think so!!!Randy Webb has probably put in more pulleys singlehandedly than anyone else in the States. Over 600 at last count, and not ONE of them has failed. Will mine? Maybe, and I guess if it does my warranty for what was affected by it directly is void. And FYI, some dealerships in the States ARE putting in Alta 15% pulleys. Being a fraction smaller than what JCW offers, obviously it doesn't mean smack to the engine if they are doing it. If you (and I mean you in the collective sense) want to pay thousands more for a JCW kit, that's your business. You'll get a JCW cylinder head (which you can have, according to several well-known mechanics I know) with colder plugs, a remapped engine, a bit more horsepower and peace of mind. Nothing wrong with that, good for you. But realize that it is possible to reasonably close to that still using 95% JCW/OEM parts and spending a lot less. BTW, I am still waiting to hear how JCW/OEM upgrades will diminish the value of my car, as you claimed they will do. "...because of your modifications you have effected the resale of your car, both price and desirability, in a negative way. Modifying cars can give a very satisfying and rewarding result but anybody who does this has to be prepared to lose money on their cars value. 2005 MCSC Last edited by MiniMelSF; Aug 7th, 2005 at 02:04 AM. |
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Will 15" wheels fit JCW CP car ? | Mz3bo | First Generation Works | 1 | Oct 18th, 2006 04:13 AM |
| 210 H.P. JCW kit installed... (5 day "mini-review") | cooper_s_flyer | First Generation MINI Cooper S | 14 | Mar 9th, 2005 04:10 AM |
| Mini Cooper voted "Best Car" by readers of "auto motor und sport" | HarryHBMCC | MINI in the Media | 0 | Feb 10th, 2003 04:40 PM |
| "lets motor" for me its "drive this car delicately on bad roads" | TeamF1Jr | First Generation MINI Cooper S | 5 | Oct 4th, 2002 09:46 AM |
|