14.08.06? - Page 8 - MINI Cooper Forum - MINI2 Mini Cooper Forums
Mini2.com Forum Header Mini2.com Forum Header
Go Back   MINI Cooper Forum - MINI2 Mini Cooper Forums > All Models & Variants > General Discussion

General Discussion Use this forum to discuss MINI topics which are not related to other forums. Posts may be moved from here to alternative forums by the moderators without notice

Please Visit our Site Sponsors
Mini2.com is the premier BMW Mini Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #106 (permalink)  
Old Aug 14th, 2006, 05:18 PM
Paul's Avatar
MINI2 Premium Member Has met Quack Quack Jack
MINI2 No.1
Offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 42,416
Local Time: 03:43 PM
England Male
We need to get some clarification on the weight issue clearly! No mention of it at all in the GB press information, the head of project management tells everyone it's up 10kg for the S (but the Cooper lighter), and now all these strange figures!

When I can get solid, confirmed figures from somewhere I'll post them (but don't hold your breath).

Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #107 (permalink)  
Old Aug 14th, 2006, 08:52 PM
Tonyt3's Avatar
MINI2 Premium Member
Track addict
Offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hants
Posts: 5,960
Local Time: 04:43 PM
United Kingdom
Quote: Originally Posted by Paul Mullett (original)
We need to get some clarification on the weight issue clearly! No mention of it at all in the GB press information, the head of project management tells everyone it's up 10kg for the S (but the Cooper lighter), and now all these strange figures!

When I can get solid, confirmed figures from somewhere I'll post them (but don't hold your breath).



Well, I for one will only believe these figures from Motoringfile when Paul quotes them on here directly from the manufacturer. - I just cant get my head around potential weight loss - the car is bigger, there are more features, usually when they make cars these days they have to 'beef up' crash protection etc, and this all adds weight. BMW even quote the engine as heavier than Tritecs figures.

SO, unless the car is made from a substantially lighter material, like aluminium, I cant see how a bigger car can weigh less. It will be verging on a miracle. There has been no mention of using aluminium extensivly...

Renault have even given up on this, the new Clio Cup 197 is bigger and weighs several hundred kilos more than the old model!!!

Dont get me wrong, I'd love to see more BHP linked to a weight loss, but the norm is for BHP to increase because the weight of the car has increased, not decreased.

But who knows, maybe BMW can reduce the cars weight substantially. However, if this were true, I would have expected to see headline press release articles on it, from BMW.

The GP only managed a 50 odd kilo weight loss, and that with ditching stuff that really is needed.... how can the standard S be 90 odd kilos lighter, but actually a bigger car...? Perhaps its filled with helium...?
Reply With Quote
  #108 (permalink)  
Old Aug 14th, 2006, 08:56 PM
mad brummie's Avatar
Has met Quack Quack Jack
I Just Can't Get Enough
Offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 49,320
Local Time: 04:43 PM
United Kingdom
i thought the new engines were alot lighter because of the alu block?

Reply With Quote
  #109 (permalink)  
Old Aug 14th, 2006, 08:57 PM
Paul's Avatar
MINI2 Premium Member Has met Quack Quack Jack
MINI2 No.1
Offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 42,416
Local Time: 03:43 PM
England Male
Details have been posted in the Cooper and S forums. The cars have actually gone down 10kg (both of them), maximum weight is up 10kg. This is from the MINI.com information and confirmed by data on the press website. It's all in the 2nd Gen S and Cooper forums now (stickies at the top of each).
Reply With Quote
  #110 (permalink)  
Old Aug 14th, 2006, 09:04 PM
Robboc's Avatar
MINI2 Regular
Offline
Send a message via MSN to Robboc
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Epsom, Surrey
Posts: 275
Local Time: 04:43 PM
England Male View Robboc's Chili Red & White 1st Gen MINI Cooper S Profile
I dont want to like the new Cooper S as I have only just joined the S club myself. I do love a turbo with their aggresive kicks, so I worry that I will start to like my little supercharged Mini less

I am not really sure if i like the exterior styling much yet. a bit too modern. that orange indicator in the headlight looks nasty. the rad grille looks to wide. It reminds me of a gaping open mouthed face with eye snot.



Reply With Quote
  #111 (permalink)  
Old Aug 14th, 2006, 09:37 PM
Tonyt3's Avatar
MINI2 Premium Member
Track addict
Offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hants
Posts: 5,960
Local Time: 04:43 PM
United Kingdom
Quote: Originally Posted by Paul Mullett (original)
Details have been posted in the Cooper and S forums. The cars have actually gone down 10kg (both of them), maximum weight is up 10kg. This is from the MINI.com information and confirmed by data on the press website. It's all in the 2nd Gen S and Cooper forums now (stickies at the top of each).


A 10kilo saving is a great result in a bigger car, that undoubtly has more standard equipment than the previous model.

But its hardly the 180lbs promised on Motoringfile.com

Much more realistic.
Reply With Quote
  #112 (permalink)  
Old Aug 14th, 2006, 09:58 PM
Tonyt3's Avatar
MINI2 Premium Member
Track addict
Offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hants
Posts: 5,960
Local Time: 04:43 PM
United Kingdom
OK, weight issue cleared up.

Motoringfile (and some of the poster on there) has previously been comparing EU laden weight of the new car (with a 65kg driver and a 3/4 full fuel tank) against the quoted US unladen weight of the old car (without a driver and fuel) therefore they have inaccurstly compared one cars weight with another....

Yes, if we dont include fuel (35litres of fuel weighs approx 35kilos) and driver at 75 kilos, we have a big weight saving.

Unfortunatly, without a driver and fuel, the car is pretty useless, whatever it weighs....

So, the car is 10kgs lighter, not 90 odd kilos lighter....

Then you put the typical American in it, and you immidiatly increase the cars laden weight by around 120kilos/ 250lbs... Sorry guys.
Reply With Quote
  #113 (permalink)  
Old Aug 14th, 2006, 10:15 PM
Paul's Avatar
MINI2 Premium Member Has met Quack Quack Jack
MINI2 No.1
Offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 42,416
Local Time: 03:43 PM
England Male
Exactly, you must compare like for like figures.
Reply With Quote
  #114 (permalink)  
Old Aug 14th, 2006, 11:36 PM
MINI2 Master
Offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 2,830
Local Time: 03:43 PM
United Kingdom Male View S33BBY's Hyper Blue & Black 1st Gen MINI Cooper Profile View S33BBY's Classified Ads
Thanks for the great write-ups, Paul.

I've got to say that overall I quite like what's been done, though I'm not upset I got a new Cooper in May and didn't wait as there's a lot of growing to be done on me. I'm really not crazy about the orange indicator lens in the headlight cluster - it sticks out like a sore thumb. The side indicator bits are a little crazy, but I'm sure they look better in the flesh and will grow on me. My biggest problem is the interior; mainly the centre console. I'm a little taken back by it. I just don't think it looks very good at all.

But as I say, overall I like the new car, and there's no denying it's an improvement in many ways over the first generation. Still, I'm extremely content with mine for the foreseeable future.


2006 MINI Cooper with JCW Sound Kit - sold July 2009
Now driving Golf VI GT TSI 1.4 160PS
Reply With Quote
  #115 (permalink)  
Old Aug 15th, 2006, 12:05 AM
MINI2 Master
Offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 2,830
Local Time: 03:43 PM
United Kingdom Male View S33BBY's Hyper Blue & Black 1st Gen MINI Cooper Profile View S33BBY's Classified Ads
I've just been checking out the new MINI preview site and I've got to say that I like it a lot more now, even the centre console. But, the reason I like the centre console is because it is slightly different on that site compared with the press pictures. Underneath the slot for the CD, there is something else, and it just looks better. Take a look!


2006 MINI Cooper with JCW Sound Kit - sold July 2009
Now driving Golf VI GT TSI 1.4 160PS
Reply With Quote
  #116 (permalink)  
Old Aug 15th, 2006, 12:07 AM
Paul's Avatar
MINI2 Premium Member Has met Quack Quack Jack
MINI2 No.1
Offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 42,416
Local Time: 03:43 PM
England Male
Maybe it's the version with Navigation (which has stereo controls moved lower)? Look at the information on the MINI.com international site too.
Reply With Quote
  #117 (permalink)  
Old Aug 15th, 2006, 07:20 AM
MINI2 Newbie
Offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4
Local Time: 04:43 PM
England
Does anyone know when the dealers will get hold of a R56 so we can see one in the flesh/metal? Apparently the specs come out in Bradford on the 18th Sept but my local dealer says 28th Sept. Has anyone heard of any other dates?
Reply With Quote
  #118 (permalink)  
Old Aug 15th, 2006, 12:52 PM
MINI2 Master
Offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 2,830
Local Time: 03:43 PM
United Kingdom Male View S33BBY's Hyper Blue & Black 1st Gen MINI Cooper Profile View S33BBY's Classified Ads
Quote: Originally Posted by Paul Mullett (original)
Maybe it's the version with Navigation (which has stereo controls moved lower)? Look at the information on the MINI.com international site too.

Ah, that's what it is. Yep, I like the version with navigation much more. That's just as well as I'd get navigation again on my next MINI!


2006 MINI Cooper with JCW Sound Kit - sold July 2009
Now driving Golf VI GT TSI 1.4 160PS
Reply With Quote
  #119 (permalink)  
Old Aug 17th, 2006, 01:45 AM
gabe's Avatar
MINI2 Regular
Offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Chicago, USA
Posts: 277
Local Time: 09:43 AM
United States View gabe's Solid Black & Body Color 1st Gen MINI Cooper S Profile
Quote: Originally Posted by Tonyt3 (original)
OK, weight issue cleared up.

Motoringfile (and some of the poster on there) has previously been comparing EU laden weight of the new car (with a 65kg driver and a 3/4 full fuel tank) against the quoted US unladen weight of the old car (without a driver and fuel) therefore they have inaccurstly compared one cars weight with another....

Yes, if we dont include fuel (35litres of fuel weighs approx 35kilos) and driver at 75 kilos, we have a big weight saving.

Then you put the typical American in it, and you immidiatly increase the cars laden weight by around 120kilos/ 250lbs... Sorry guys.

Just to clear a few things up.... it was very high ranking MINI exec who spread the weight info. I can't go into more details but this information seemed to be incorrect at a rather broad level throughout the organization so there was some major communcation break-downs going on. So basically don't shoot the messenger - this wasn't just some information heard from a friend of a friend.

At least we (MF) were correct in saying that there was a weight decrease rather than increase with the R56 In fact we were told that the information given to people at the MINI preview event was intended to mask the final weight figures. Why that was done I'll leave that up to others to speculate.

One more thing... Tony it may surprise you to know that most Americans don't resemble those found on the Jerry Spring show As someone who runs and goes to the gym daily, I can say that there are many of us that don't quite match your 250lbs stereotype
Reply With Quote
  #120 (permalink)  
Old Aug 17th, 2006, 08:32 AM
Paul's Avatar
MINI2 Premium Member Has met Quack Quack Jack
MINI2 No.1
Offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 42,416
Local Time: 03:43 PM
England Male
Well, we were told of a weight reduction early on (which we reported) which was more like those figures you represented. Then the head of MINI Project Management told all the press it was a 10kg weight gain at the preview drive (and as all other information we were given was correct, I think that was a blunder, not a deliberate lie to the assembled media), in the end it's a 10kg weight loss with a 10kg max possible weight increase. Doesn't matter, in the end it's lighter, and faster, and more efficient. Which is all good.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:43 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2